Did Paul practice a private form of a tongue?

Did Paul practice a private form of a tongue?

1 Corinthians 14:18-19

I thank my God I speak with tongues more than you all; yet in the church I would rather speak five words with my understanding, that I may teach others also, than ten thousand words in a tongue.

Charismatics often cite this verse to justify speaking in tongues by claiming Paul practiced it privately.

The purpose of Paul’s letter, however, was not to encourage the use of tongues, but rather to confront the pride of the Corinthian congregation, who used the gift for self-serving purposes where some believers assumed superiority due to the fact that they spoke in different dialects.

The Greek word for “tongue” used in this verse is “glōssa”, which refers to a human language or dialect. It is important to note that in the New Testament, this term consistently points to foreign languages that were previously unknown to the speaker but supernaturally enabled by the Holy Spirit. For example: Acts 2:4-11 provides a clear demonstration of this, where the apostles spoke in authentic, recognizable languages that were understood by people from various nations.

In the context of 1 Corinthians 14, Paul is addressing the misuse of this gift. The Corinthians were elevating the gift of tongues to a status it was never meant to have. Paul emphasizes the need for edification within the church and deems it more valuable to speak words that teach and build up others than to utter thousands of unintelligible words in a foreign language.

The  Apostle Paul had miraculously spoken in foreign languages more than anyone else. He also wanted the church to  understand that love triumphed over all gifts.

1 Corinthians 13:1-2 (NKJV)

Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I have become sounding brass or a clanging cymbal. And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries and all knowledge, and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, but have not love, I am nothing.

Paul’s priority was to use the gifts within the body of the church to build up others. The self-centered approach to the gift, which was prevalent in Corinth, was discouraged.

Do Tongues Require Bypassing the Mind

Do Tongues Require Bypassing the Mind?

Those in charismatic circles who express skepticism and doubt about speaking in tongues are often told to shut their minds and allow God to work.

This is however contrary to the teachings of Paul who would never recommend prayers that bypass the mind as many charismatics do;

1 Corinthians 14:13-17 (NKJV)

Therefore let him who speaks in a tongue pray that he may interpret. For if I pray in a tongue, my spirit prays, but my understanding is unfruitful. What is the conclusion then? I will pray with the spirit, and I will also pray with the understanding. I will sing with the spirit, and I will also sing with the understanding. Otherwise, if you bless with the spirit, how will he who occupies the place of the uninformed say “Amen” at your giving of thanks, since he does not understand what you say? For you indeed give thanks well, but the other is not edified.

Exactly what does it mean to “bypass the mind”?

Throughout history, this practice has been associated with pagan religions. During the Greco-Roman mystery religions, utterances were commonly used to circumvent the mind and commune with demonic entities.

In the verse above, Paul uses a sarcastic tone to rebuke the Corinthians church for their attempt to imitate mindless pagan practices.

It is important to understand that the proper use of this gift involves both the mind and the spirit. The mind is central to true worship and communication with God. Paul teaches us that both the spirit and the mind must be engaged in prayer and worship.

Faith is not a mindless act but a response to the truth of God, rooted in understanding and conviction. Practices that bypass the mind are unbiblical and resemble pagan rituals rather than Christian worship.

The proper use of spiritual gifts always involves clarity, understanding, and the edification of others. As believers, we are called to love God with all our heart, soul, and mind (Matthew 22:37), making it crucial to avoid anything that undermines this command.

Tongues was an authentic language

Tongues was an authentic language

The new testament supernatural gift of tongues served to authenticate the Apostles’ supernatural message – the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

This caught the attention of the people around who were amazed by the phenomenon of people speaking in languages that they did not know.

As soon as the crowd gathered, Peter stood up and preached the gospel of Jesus Christ in a language that everyone understood, and three thousand people were saved.

Let’s examine some scriptures:

Acts 2:4 (NKJV)

And they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance.

The disciples spoke in authentic languages. The Greek word for tongues is “glōssa,” which is a term that refers to human language.

In the following verses 6-7, the same word is used to refer to “dialect / own language” and in verses 9-11, it refers to a list of “foreign languages.”

Acts 2:6-7 (NKJV)

And when this sound occurred, the multitude came together, and were confused, because everyone heard them speak in his own language. Then they were all amazed and marveled, saying to one another, “Look, are not all these who speak Galileans?

Acts 2:9-11 (NKJV)

Parthians and Medes and Elamites, those dwelling in Mesopotamia, Judea and Cappadocia, Pontus and Asia, Phrygia and Pamphylia, Egypt and the parts of Libya adjoining Cyrene, visitors from Rome, both Jews and proselytes, Cretans and Arabs—we hear them speaking in our own tongues the wonderful works of God.

Due to the celebrations of Pentecost, Jews from all over the world had travelled to Jerusalem for the feast of passover (Acts 2:5), this included many pilgrims who had grown up speaking languages other than Aramaic.

Seeing uneducated Galileans suddenly speaking in multiple languages fluently became an obvious miracle that astonished the crowd.

Additionally, there were native Judeans in the crowd who could not understand what the disciples were saying because they didn’t speak those languages. In their utter confusion as they sought an explanation, and responded with skepticism / mockery / accusing the disciples of being drunk (verse 13).

When we consider the larger picture of the early church movement, the phenomenon of tongues in Acts is connected to key moments of expansion in the church’s mission. In Acts 8, tongues likely occurred as the gospel moved into Samaria, marking the inclusion of the Samaritans into the faith.

In Acts 10, tongues are recorded when the gospel reaches the Gentiles through Cornelius and his household, signifying their acceptance into God’s family. Finally, in Acts 19, tongues occur when John the Baptist’s disciples are brought into the church, affirming their full inclusion into the body of Christ.

Each instance of tongues in Acts served a critical purpose: confirming God’s work in spreading the gospel to new groups and ensuring that the message was understood across cultural and linguistic barriers.

Each new phase of the church was marked by the same sign given on Pentecost. This repetition demonstrated that the same Spirit was at work across all groups, ensuring that the Jews did not perceive any difference between themselves and Samaritans or Gentiles. It was therefore a sign gift, indicating God’s nearness and authenticating the authority of those proclaiming His message.

When you compare the day of Pentecost with the Tower of Babel, there is a surprising contrast. As a judgment on humanity, the Lord confused the languages of the world at the Tower of Babel.

However, on the day of Pentecost, the curse of Babel miraculously disappeared. This demonstrates that God’s wonderful words, including the gospel of Jesus Christ, are spread throughout the world. Regardless of the language spoken, the message remains the same: the good news of salvation through Jesus Christ transcends all linguistic and cultural barriers, uniting people under one gospel.

Christians in the centuries following the apostles understood the miracle of languages (tongues) in exactly the same way.

In light of this, tongues and other miraculous signs are no longer necessary to authenticate a speaker’s message. Today, we discern whether a speaker is truly from God by measuring their message against the truth of Scripture.

The Bible, which the people of the apostolic era did not yet have in its complete form, now serves as our ultimate authority. This is why the Apostles were granted gifts of signs and wonders—to validate the divine origin of the gospel message they were delivering during a foundational period for the church.

2 Corinthians 12:12 (NKJV)

Truly the signs of an apostle were accomplished among you with all perseverance, in signs and wonders and mighty deeds.

The early Pentecostals right up to the early 20th century believed Acts 2 was a real language. As charismatics understood that modern tongues were not true languages, they began to devise novel interpretations in order to justify their unorthodox inventions.

Tongues Required an interpreter

Another point that attests to the fact that the gift of tongues was an authentic language is that an interpreter was always required to make the message meaningful.

As Paul states in his letter to the Corinthians, when the gift of tongues is used in the church, it must be translated by someone with the gift of interpretation.

1 Corinthians 14:27 (NKJV)

If anyone speaks in a tongue, let there be two or at the most three, each in turn, and let one interpret.

Paul indicated that the gift of tongues consisted of rational languages. The word interpretation is “Hermenevo” from which we get the word “Hermeneutics” which refers to a “translation” or an “accurate unfolding of the meaning.”

Obviously it would have been impossible to translate non-sensical gibberish, since translations require concrete meanings in one language to be rendered correctly in another.

    Truth about tongues

    Truth about tongues

    W.A. Chriswell, an American pastor said the following on tongues – “In the long story of the church, after the days of the Apostles, whenever the phenomenon of glossolalia has appeared it has always been looked upon as heresy.”

    • The kind of tongues we see today are largely confined to the 19th – 20th century.
    • Early churches have universally repudiated it as a doctrine, having never accepted it.
    • Glossolalia practiced today is a counterfeit that fails to meet the New Testament description of tongues.
    • Unlike modern tongues, which are learned behaviors, the New Testament gift of tongues involved a supernatural ability to be able to speak in foreign languages that the speaker had not learned before.
    • Even respectable theologians (like Norman Geisler) would agree that those who believe in modern tongues also acknowledge that unsaved people are experiencing the supposed gift.
    • A further problem with tongues speaking, as manifested today, is that it is a pagan / heathen concept. At its core, it is a merger of Christianity and paganism. It has been said that Tibetan monks speak in tongues, certain tribes of Eskimos speak in tongues, the whirling dervishes of Persia speak in tongues, and even one of the basic tenets of Mormonism speaks in tongues.

    The Charismatic defense of tongues

    The Charismatic defense of tongues

    In defense of speaking in tongues, Charismatics sometimes use the following arguments:

    “Tongue speech is unique to each individual and often begins with nothing more than a syllable thoughtlessly repeated.”

    “When you ask the Holy Spirit, you may hear a syllable bubble up or roll around in your head. As soon as you speak it in faith, it will be like opening a dam, and your language will become a poem.”

    “You don’t understand what you’re saying… However, it is more about praying with your spirit than with your mind.”

    The tongues experience will bring you closer to God. I feel like I am able to tap into God’s heart and what He desires. I don’t really know what I’m supposed to say or speak, but I know it’s what God wants me to say. The feeling is more like an entitlement, you can feel Him all around you and through your words.”

    “Some people get goosebumps and a warm, fuzzy feeling inside.”

    It is true that these arguments may sound good in theory or may even come from a good intention, but they do not fully justify or explain the experience and how it helps us grow in sanctification.

    Many of these experiences occur when a person enters a trance-like state of altered consciousness, which may well be induced by circumstances around them.

    The modern expressions of glossolalia are deceptive and dangerous, offering only a pretense of true spirituality. Charismatics may claim it is God speaking through them, but there is no evidence that this comes from the Holy Spirit or aids in His work of producing holiness.

    A made up language

    Tongues – A Made up language?

    Linguists who have studied the modern glossolalia (speaking in unknowing language) all agree that there is no mystery about the ‘tongues’ language.

    The University of Toronto linguistics professor William Samarin wrote this:

    There is no mystery about glossolalia. Tape-recorded samples are easy to obtain and to analyze.  They always turn out to be the same thing: strings of syllables, made up of sounds taken from among all those that the speaker knows, put together more or less haphazardly but which nevertheless emerge as word-like and sentence-like units because of realistic, language-like rhythm and melody. Glossolalia is indeed like language in some ways, but this is only because the speaker (unconsciously) wants it to be like language. Yet in spite of the superficial similarities, glossolalia is fundamentally not language. All specimens of glossolalia that have ever been studied have produced no features that would even suggest that they reflect some kind of communicative system. . . . Glossolalia is not a supernatural phenomenon. . . . In fact, anybody can produce glossolalia if he is uninhibited and if he discovers what the “trick” is.

    Pin It on Pinterest