Dead Sea scrolls

Dead Sea scrolls

What are the Dead Sea scrolls?

Post Date

June 18, 2021

Reading Time ‘Minutes’

Word Count

The dead sea scrolls discovery was one of the most significant finds of the 20th century.

This finding helped authenticate many of the stories and events mentioned in the Bible. 

The discovery of the dead sea scrolls first took place in 1947 by three Bedouin shepherds exploring the mountainous area in a village called Qumran situated about 20 miles east of Jerusalem, on the northwest shore of the Dead Sea.  

One of the shepherds threw a rock into a cave and heard some pottery shatter and so they decided to come back and explore it further.

The next day one of the cousins got up early and climbed into the cave to find the jar shattered, and inside it was a bunch of scrolls.

He was disappointed to come across a few ancient manuscripts; however, he had no idea that these scrolls would be worth millions and would turn the archaeological and biblical world upside down.

The rock they had thrown had hit a ceramic pot containing scrolls made of leather and papyrus that were later determined to be nearly 20 centuries old.  

Since the initial discovery of the dead sea scrolls, archaeologists have gone back and found at least 11 caves with at least 1,000 different complete manuscripts or scrolls of portions of ancient writings. 

Basically, they found an ancient library of books that gave us a glimpse into the first century and earlier that we never had before.

These writings were done between 250 BC before the time of Christ and 64 AD before the time the Romans came in and destroyed everything in Jerusalem.

Many of these writings were just personal writings for the community, but about 300 of these found were actually Biblical books – that is, every biblical book of the Old Testament except the book of Ester was found in whole or in some cases a partial copy of it.  

Of the Biblical findings, one of the most significant was the Great Isiah scroll (which prophesies the coming of Jesus and gives an account of how He would be crucified).

The reason it is essential is that this scroll dates to about 125 BC, about a century and a quarter before Jesus was born. Before this finding, the only copy of the book of Isiah we had in its completion was a version dated to 1008 AD.  

So historians tested this copy of the scroll that was before the birth of Christ and the copy written one thousand years after the death of Christ to see if there were any apparent changes made.

What they found was remarkable as both documents were virtually identical. There were a few minor spelling / grammatical mistakes, but that is justified since they copied them by hand over a millennium.

In totality, this shows how much care the Jewish scholars took into consideration when copying the word of God. 

This finding also gives confidence to those reading the Bible today that the scribes were not just freely changing things in their writings or carelessly just adapting things. Rather, the Jewish scholars did all they could to make sure that the scriptures were copied carefully. 

The dead sea scrolls finding is one reason among many that we can trust that the Bible we have today has not been manipulated or tampered with.

The dead sea scrolls finding is one reason among many that we can trust that the Bible we have today has not been manipulated or tampered with.

SEE SIMILAR QUESTIONS

Dead Sea scrolls

The dead sea scrolls discovery was one of the most significant finds of the 20th century.

What about the apocryphal books?

Protestants believe these books are not canonical for several reasons.

Is there enough textual evidence for the New Testament?

can we rely on the new testament scripture? How much evidence do we have for it?

Missing bible verses

What about the missing Bible verses?

When you compare some of the modern bible translations (example NIV, ESV, HSSB) with that of the King James Version (KJV), it would seem as though there are some “missing verses.”

right books in the bible

How can i be sure that the right books were included in the bible?

People often ask this question concerning the canonization (compilation) of the Bible and if Jesus would have affirmed all the books and if God inspired all of them.
So is the Bible we have today complete and authorized by God?

bible translations

Why are there so many translations of the Bible?

This is a favorite question quoted by those disputing the authenticity of the Bible. The general assumption being that the Bible has been translated so many times that we no longer have a reliable copy or one that even resembles what was originally written.

bible study

Why should I study the Bible?

Some believers question that since we know the truth of the gospel and have given our lives to Jesus Christ, why do we need to study the Bible?

Bible contradictions?

Are there any contradictions in the Bible?

Are there challenging passages in the Bible? Yes, some readings are easy to understand, and some are tough. Are there Biblical challenges? Yes, but any verified contradictions? Absolutely not.

Bible Historically reliable

Is the Bible Historically Reliable?

If the Bible is true, it must also be historically reliable. In other words, its portrayal of people, places, and events that it claims to have occurred must be accurate.

bible preserved word of god

Has the Bible been fabricated, altered, revised, or tampered with?

So has the Bible been divinely preserved? Let us look at the facts and determine this.

why should i believe the Bible?

There are numerous facts about the Bible that when combined together would give a compelling case for anyone to believe in it.

What about the apocryphal books?

What about the apocryphal books?

What about the apocryphal books?

Last Updated

Nov 13, 2020

Reading Time ‘Minutes’

Word Count

The Roman Catholic Bible consists of 7 additional books, which are mainly referred to as the Apocrypha (meaning “hidden” or doubtful”).

The Apocrypha contains books of doubtful authenticity and authority, which were written between the Old and New Testament (including Tobit, Ecclesiasticus, and 1 and 2 Maccabees).

The Roman Catholics decided to add these books to the Bible at the Council of Trent (AD 1545–1563), mainly in response to the protestant reformation period.

Protestants believe these books are not canonical for several reasons.

  • No New Testament writer quoted from any of these books as Scripture or considered them to be inspired, though they often quoted from Old Testament books.

 

  • Jesus and the disciples virtually ignored these books. They wouldn’t have if they considered them to be God-inspired Scripture.

 

  • The Jewish Council of Jamnia, which met in AD 90, rejected the Apocrypha as Scripture. In addition, most of the church fathers of the first four centuries of the Christian church did not accept these books as inspired.

 

  • The Apocryphal books were written between 250 BC and the first century AD. However, according to Judaism, by about 400 BC, the Spirit of prophecy had departed from Israel.

 

  • The Apocrypha contains clear historical errors, such as the assumption that Sennacherib was the son of Shalmaneser instead of Sargon II (see Tobit 1:15).”

 

  • Unlike many of the biblical books, no Apocryphal book claims divine inspiration.

 

  • Unlike the Old and New Testaments, the Apocrypha contains no predictive prophecy.

 

  • Augustine acknowledged the Apocrypha at first but then rejected it from the canon and considered it inferior to the Hebrew Scriptures.”

 

  • Jerome, the great Roman Catholic scholar who lived around AD 420 who translated the Latin Vulgate Bible, emphatically rejected the apocryphal books.

 

  • They were not written by the apostles whose names they bear since the apostles died in the first century

 

  • They contain many heresies and doctrinal errors.

 

  • They claim to contain childhood miracles of Jesus, but John said Jesus did not perform any miracles until he was an adult (Jn 2:11).

 

  • They contain highly embellished accounts of the gospel stories, an indication they were later fabrications.

 

  • The acceptance of these books in AD 1546 by the Roman Catholic church is unjustified since; (a) they were the wrong group of to make this decision (Christians, not Jews); (b) it took place at the wrong time (16th Century AD), and (c) it was done for the wrong reasons (for example to support the doctrine of prayers for the dead (see Mac 12:45) in response to the Reformation and Biblical teachings such as purgatory, praying to saints, etc.

the Bible we have is complete to make us wise enough onto salvation.

SEE SIMILAR QUESTIONS

Dead Sea scrolls

The dead sea scrolls discovery was one of the most significant finds of the 20th century.

What about the apocryphal books?

Protestants believe these books are not canonical for several reasons.

Is there enough textual evidence for the New Testament?

can we rely on the new testament scripture? How much evidence do we have for it?

Missing bible verses

What about the missing Bible verses?

When you compare some of the modern bible translations (example NIV, ESV, HSSB) with that of the King James Version (KJV), it would seem as though there are some “missing verses.”

right books in the bible

How can i be sure that the right books were included in the bible?

People often ask this question concerning the canonization (compilation) of the Bible and if Jesus would have affirmed all the books and if God inspired all of them.
So is the Bible we have today complete and authorized by God?

Is there enough textual evidence for the New Testament?

Is there enough textual evidence for the New Testament?

Is there enough textual evidence for the New Testament?

Last Updated

May 7, 2020

Reading Time ‘Minutes’

Word Count

Compared to other ancient documents, the New Testament has far more textual evidence in its favor than any other ancient writing.
The Bible is the only ancient document that has withstood years of transmission with remarkable accuracy and clarity.

The Bible was written within 30 to 60 years from Jesus’ death and within the lifetime of His apostles and followers.

The earliest copy of the manuscript available is also only within 130 years from Jesus’ death. Furthermore, the vast amount of copies available (about 24,000) make it considerably hard for anyone who was trying to alter/modify any of the verses in the Bible.

We can trust it to be what it says it is: the word of God.

Please refer to the chart below for a comparison of the New Testament with the other ancient documents.

This chart was adapted from “Evidence that Demands a Verdict” by Josh McDowell, 1979, pages 42 and 43.

Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away.

SEE SIMILAR QUESTIONS

Dead Sea scrolls

The dead sea scrolls discovery was one of the most significant finds of the 20th century.

What about the apocryphal books?

Protestants believe these books are not canonical for several reasons.

Is there enough textual evidence for the New Testament?

can we rely on the new testament scripture? How much evidence do we have for it?

Missing bible verses

What about the missing Bible verses?

When you compare some of the modern bible translations (example NIV, ESV, HSSB) with that of the King James Version (KJV), it would seem as though there are some “missing verses.”

right books in the bible

How can i be sure that the right books were included in the bible?

People often ask this question concerning the canonization (compilation) of the Bible and if Jesus would have affirmed all the books and if God inspired all of them.
So is the Bible we have today complete and authorized by God?

What about the missing Bible verses?

What about the missing Bible verses?

What about the missing Bible verses?

Last Updated

June 10, 2021

Reading Time ‘Minutes’

Word Count

When you compare some of the modern bible translations (for example, NIV, ESV, HSSB) with that of the King James Version (KJV), it would seem as though there are some “missing verses.” 

But didn’t Jesus say that not one word would be lost (Matthew 5:18)? So how can there be missing verses then? And if there are, how then can we rely on the Bible?

The answer is not as complicated as some might think.

First off, the KJV Bible, written in 1611 AD, used the best resources that were available to them at the time and did a great job in ensuring that the Bible was accurately translated into the common English language. 

However, years since 1611, many older manuscripts have been discovered and carefully evaluated by scholars. Typically scholars consider older manuscripts to be more reliable (since they are closer in time to the original documents).

Therefore most modern Bible translations would exclude/omit verses that appear in the KJV translations but do not appear in the older manuscripts. 

However, it must be noted that most modern translations still include a reference to the missing verses as part of the footnotes. 

Secondly, the original manuscripts of the Bible were not divided into chapters and verses as we have them today. Humans have divided the text to make it easier for Christians around the world to teach, preach, write, and speak about the Bible.

Following the translation of the Geneva Bible in 1560, the 1611 edition of the King James Bible was the first major translation of the Bible, which slightly altered the chapter and verse divisions. All modern English translations now follow this same structure. 

The tricky part for scholars is deciding what to do when a verse assigned a number in the 1500s turns out not to be part of the original manuscript/text. Since we cannot merely alter all verses, the translators will leave the verse blank and continue with the original numbering. 

This strategy helps maintain consistency; for example, if John 3:15 were not in the original text, and if we would move John 3:16 up a verse, then everyone who quotes John 3:16 would not have a similar verse. 

Conclusion 

It is essential to keep in mind that none of the missing verses disrupts the essential Christian teachings. The key message of Jesus as the divine Son of God, the Triune Godhead, the virgin birth of Jesus, His death, burial, resurrection, ascension, and second coming all remain undeterred.

Whether you prefer the ESV, NIV, NASB, or other modern translations, you can still rest confident that it is a trustworthy translation. That it is “living and active” (Hebrews 4:12), “inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness; so that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work” (2 Timothy 3:16-17).

Most importantly, the Bible you hold contains the true message of God’s plan for salvation for our lives. 

For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.

Mathew 5:18

SEE SIMILAR QUESTIONS

Dead Sea scrolls

The dead sea scrolls discovery was one of the most significant finds of the 20th century.

What about the apocryphal books?

Protestants believe these books are not canonical for several reasons.

Is there enough textual evidence for the New Testament?

can we rely on the new testament scripture? How much evidence do we have for it?

Missing bible verses

What about the missing Bible verses?

When you compare some of the modern bible translations (example NIV, ESV, HSSB) with that of the King James Version (KJV), it would seem as though there are some “missing verses.”

right books in the bible

How can i be sure that the right books were included in the bible?

People often ask this question concerning the canonization (compilation) of the Bible and if Jesus would have affirmed all the books and if God inspired all of them.
So is the Bible we have today complete and authorized by God?

How can i be sure that the right books were included in the bible?

How can i be sure that the right books were included in the bible?

How can i be sure that the right books were included in the Bible?

Last Updated

June 12, 2021

Reading Time ‘Minutes’

Word Count

People often wonder whether the right books were added during the  canonization (compilation) of the Bible. Would Jesus have affirmed all the books?  Did God inspire all of them?

There is also much talk about certain books discovered post the canonization but were not included as part of the Bible. 

So is the Bible we have today complete and authorized by God?

Bruce Metzger, Princeton University, puts it well when He said,  “the cannon is a list of authoritative books more than it is an authoritative list of books.”

What he meant by this statement is that Christians did not determine what should be in the Bible. Instead, Christians discovered what books were inspired and only put those in the Bible. 

They did so by asking the following questions:

  • Was it written by an acclaimed prophet of God?
  • Was the writing confirmed by the acts of God or by someone who was an established eyewitness? For example, Paul, who witnessed the resurrected Jesus and performed miracles, endorsed the books Luke who had interviewed multiple eyewitnesses. 
  • Was it accepted by the people of God?

    Further, the approved books were the ones that met the following criteria, for example. 

    • The acts performed were cited / recorded during the lives of the apostles. 
    • They the books were quoted as authoritative and unique by the early church fathers. 
    • The books were collected in one initial volume rather than scattered manuscripts put together. 
    • They were publicly read and expounded. They were not hidden books used only by a specific group. 
    • Commentaries were written on these books, which means that they would have had to been thoroughly studied.
    • There were also testimonies from opponents who even admitted that the disciples wrote the gospels. 

    All the books of the Bible meet one or more of these criteria’s. 

    In addition, people question recent discoveries of scripture and wonder why the books have not been included as part of the Bible. Famous examples of these books include the “Gospel of Thomas” and “Gospel of Judas.” 

    However, these books are proven to be written by forgers who put the names of the apostles on it to try and authenticate their writings.

    Further, these discovered books were also written during the second century and not within the lifetime of the apostles.

    Lastly, when comparing these books to the above criteria’s they would fail in being classified as an authoritative scripture to be canonized.

    We must note that if God is the divine author of the Bible, He would surely have ensured that His word is preserved by the power of the Holy Spirit. 

    1 Peter 1:24-25 (NKJV)

    24. because “All flesh is as grass, And all the glory of man as the flower of the grass. The grass withers, And its flower falls away,

    25. But the word of the Lord endures forever.” Now this is the word which by the gospel was preached to you.

    Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away.

    SEE SIMILAR QUESTIONS

    Dead Sea scrolls

    The dead sea scrolls discovery was one of the most significant finds of the 20th century.

    What about the apocryphal books?

    Protestants believe these books are not canonical for several reasons.

    Is there enough textual evidence for the New Testament?

    can we rely on the new testament scripture? How much evidence do we have for it?

    Missing bible verses

    What about the missing Bible verses?

    When you compare some of the modern bible translations (example NIV, ESV, HSSB) with that of the King James Version (KJV), it would seem as though there are some “missing verses.”

    right books in the bible

    How can i be sure that the right books were included in the bible?

    People often ask this question concerning the canonization (compilation) of the Bible and if Jesus would have affirmed all the books and if God inspired all of them.
    So is the Bible we have today complete and authorized by God?

    Why are there so many translations of the Bible?

    Why are there so many translations of the Bible?

    Why are there so many translations of the Bible?

    Last Updated

    Jun 12 , 2021

    Reading Time ‘Minutes’

    Word Count

    This is a favorite question posed by those who dispute the authenticity of the Bible.

    The general assumption is that the Bible has been translated so often that we no longer have a reliable copy or one that even resembles what was originally written. 

    There is a game called the ‘Chinese whisper’ where one person whispers into the ear of another person.

    This process continues until the end of the line, and when you an ascertain what was initially said it would be entirely different.

    Like this game, many have determined that the Bible has lost its original meaning through various translations.

    However, this assumption would only apply if the scriptures we have today were translations of older translations (i.e., the interpretation of the NIV version based on the KJV version and so forth).  But this is not the case.

    How are the Bible versions translated?

    Biblical scholars transcribe each Bible version by using the original manuscripts written in Greek Hebrew and Aramaic as a base/source and not previously translated versions. All the major Bible translations available today have been translated this way.

    But why have so many translations?

    We have so many translations because language changes over time, and words take on a different meaning as society changes. Therefore, someone translating something generations ago would have worded something differently than they would have if they produced it today. 

    Since language is continuously developing/evolving, we have different Bible versions to update and clarify these changes. 

    God wants everyone to understand His Word, and a good translation can help us do that. God told His prophet to “write down the revelation and make it plain” (Habakkuk 2:2).

    Another reason why there are many translations is because the Bible was written in three ancient languages, but when it comes to interpretation, scholars have found certain textual distinctions that exist in the Hebrew and Greek languages.

    To resolve these issues, Committees use different translation principles when translating to English or any other language. 

    Some translations are a word for word translation that takes the original word in Greek and Hebrew and translates the literal word. Although this process gives clarity of words, it can sometimes read as a little vague. 

    Other translation principles involve adopting a thought for thought approach using the ideas/views so that the text would read more smoothly in context.  

    Bible scholars usually recommend using at least two translations. The reasoning is not only to make sure you are getting the right meaning but also, to attain the fullness of all contributing factors that come into understanding God’s word.

    In conclusion, having multiple translations does not imply that the original meaning of the verses was lost or changed; rather, we have them because language changes over time.

    Committees are working around different principles to bring the distinctions of an ancient language to the present age. 

    In short, the Bible versions were created to allow for easy reading and to suit a more modern language style.

    It is also worth noting that none of the core fundamentals of the faith are altered/disrupted in the process of translation, such as salvation through grace, the virgin birth, the resurrection, the crucifixion of Jesus, etc.

    Bible versions were created to allow for easy reading and to suit a more modern language style.

    SEE SIMILAR QUESTIONS

    Dead Sea scrolls

    The dead sea scrolls discovery was one of the most significant finds of the 20th century.

    What about the apocryphal books?

    Protestants believe these books are not canonical for several reasons.

    Is there enough textual evidence for the New Testament?

    can we rely on the new testament scripture? How much evidence do we have for it?

    Missing bible verses

    What about the missing Bible verses?

    When you compare some of the modern bible translations (example NIV, ESV, HSSB) with that of the King James Version (KJV), it would seem as though there are some “missing verses.”

    right books in the bible

    How can i be sure that the right books were included in the bible?

    People often ask this question concerning the canonization (compilation) of the Bible and if Jesus would have affirmed all the books and if God inspired all of them.
    So is the Bible we have today complete and authorized by God?

    Pin It on Pinterest