Why does God harden hearts?

Why does God harden hearts?

Last Updated

Jul 23, 2026

Reading Time 'Minutes'

Word Count

Most people meet this question in Exodus, and they meet it as an accusation. God is about to send Moses back into Egypt, and before a single plague has fallen, before Pharaoh has said one word, God says this:

Exodus 4:21 (NKJV)

And the LORD said to Moses, “When you go back to Egypt, see that you do all those wonders before Pharaoh which I have put in your hand. But I will harden his heart, so that he will not let the people go.”

If we look at the entire book of Exodus and not simply this verse in isolation, we will see two very prominent things. Ten times we are told that God hardened Pharaoh's heart (4:21; 7:3; 9:12; 10:1, 20, 27; 11:10; 14:4, 8, 17). Ten times we are told that Pharaoh hardened his own (7:13–14, 22; 8:15, 19, 32; 9:7, 34–35; 13:15).

Exodus 8:32 (NKJV)

But Pharaoh hardened his heart at this time also; neither would he let the people go.

Notice that the writer of Exodus is not troubled by this. He is not trying to reconcile the two, or slip one past us while we are looking at the other. He sets them side by side, because both are true.

God did not make a good man wicked

God did not reach into a tender heart and turn it to stone. He did not pour cruelty into a man who had none. Look at Pharaoh before any hardening is mentioned in the story. Moses comes with the word of the LORD, and this is the answer he gets:

Exodus 5:2 (NKJV)

And Pharaoh said, “Who is the LORD, that I should obey His voice to let Israel go? I do not know the LORD, nor will I let Israel go.”

That is not a man who needed corrupting. That is a slave-master who had built his throne on the backs of a whole nation, who had ordered Hebrew boys drowned in the river, and whose settled conviction was that no one in heaven or earth outranked him. When the plagues came, Pharaoh did not do anything he did not want to do. He was never dragged. He was never overruled. At every point he did precisely what he most wanted, and what he most wanted was his own way.

This is how Scripture speaks of hardening in one simple sense — God letting go. Three times in Romans 1, Paul describes God's judgment on a world that will not have Him, and each time the verb is the same: God gave them up. He gave them up to their uncleanness, to their passions, to a debased mind — that is, He handed them over to themselves. He stopped holding them back. And when God stops holding a man back, that man does not become someone else. He becomes, at last, entirely himself.

That is the first half of the answer. Every restraint Pharaoh ever felt — every twinge of conscience, every hesitation, every moment when he nearly relented — was God's mercy holding him in check. When God withdrew that mercy, He did not add one grain of wickedness to Pharaoh's heart. He simply took His hand off a man who had spent his life straining against it.

But God meant it, and He said so in advance

Now we must be honest about the part that is harder to swallow, because a great many writers stop at the paragraph above and leave the reader with the impression that God merely stood by. He did not merely stand by. He announced the hardening before it happened (4:21), and He tells us plainly what He was doing it for:

Exodus 14:4 (NKJV)

“Then I will harden Pharaoh's heart, so that he will pursue them; and I will gain honor over Pharaoh and over all his army, that the Egyptians may know that I am the LORD.” And they did so.

There is the why, and Paul repeats it centuries later, quoting God's own words to Pharaoh as the settled explanation of the whole affair:

Romans 9:17–18 (NKJV)

For the Scripture says to the Pharaoh, “For this very purpose I have raised you up, that I may show My power in you, and that My name may be declared in all the earth.” Therefore He has mercy on whom He wills, and whom He wills He hardens.

So the answer to the question is this: God hardens hearts in order to display His power and make His name known in all the earth. Pharaoh's hardness was not an obstacle God had to work around; it was the very thing through which God worked.

Every refusal set up another plague. Every plague brought down another Egyptian god — the Nile, the sun, the cattle, the firstborn heir — until the greatest empire on earth had been dismantled in public by the God of a slave people. Had Pharaoh let Israel go after the first plague, there would have been no Red Sea. There would have been no song on the far shore. There would have been no story for Israel to tell its children for the next three thousand years.

Why could Pharaoh watch the Nile turn to blood and still say no?

People often ask how any man could see the miracles Pharaoh saw and refuse to bend. But that assumes evidence softens hearts. It does not. Pharaoh had made up his mind before the first plague fell — I do not know the LORD, nor will I let Israel go — and a made-up mind is not moved by facts. It is only confirmed by them.

Do not mistake what happened after the last plague. Pharaoh did not repent when his son died. He surrendered, which is not the same thing, and within days he had changed his mind again and was chasing Israel across the desert with six hundred chariots. Catastrophe did not melt that heart. It only revealed how cold it had gone. This is what hardening does.

The Bible asks the same of us today

Hebrews 3:15 (NKJV)

while it is said: “Today, if you will hear His voice, do not harden your hearts as in the rebellion.”

Today. The warning is not aimed at Egyptians three thousand years ago. It is aimed at the reader, and its urgency comes from the fact that hardening is progressive. Every time God's voice is heard and set aside, the ear grows a little duller. No one chooses, on a particular morning, to become a man who cannot repent. He simply says “not yet” often enough, and one day finds that “not yet” has become “cannot.”

And here we must be careful, because the natural thing to say next is: so soften your heart. But that is precisely what a heart of stone cannot do. Stone does not decide to become flesh. If Pharaoh's own strength could not save him, ours will not save us either; and if the softening of a heart were finally our work, then Hebrews would be handing us an instruction we have no power to carry out.

So God does not hand us an instruction. He makes a promise:

Ezekiel 36:26 (NKJV)

I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit within you; I will take the heart of stone out of your flesh and give you a heart of flesh.

Read who is doing the work in that verse. I will give. I will put. I will take out. Every verb belongs to God. The same sovereign hand that withdrew from Pharaoh and left him to himself is the hand that reaches into a dead man's chest and puts a living heart there — and it is not owed to anyone. It is mercy, and mercy by definition is never earned.

IF YOUR HEART HAS BEEN HARDENED IN ANY SPECIFIC AREA, YOU SHOULD GO TO GOD, AND HE WILL GLADLY SOFTEN IT.

Does God Command Human sacrifice?

Does God command human sacrifice?

Last Updated

Jul 23, 2026

Reading Time 'Minutes'

Word Count

Genesis 22 is the passage people throw down as their trump card against the God of the Old Testament. Here God tells Abraham to take Isaac — the son he waited a lifetime for, the son the promise itself depended on — up a mountain and kill him.

Genesis 22:2 (NKJV)

Then He said, “Take now your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you.”

Let's just speak of the plain fact before we go any further into this conversation. The simple truth is that it did not happen. God stopped it. The knife never came down. And He did not stop it at the last moment because He had changed His mind, or because Abraham had talked Him out of it. He stopped it because it was never going to happen — because a ram was already caught in a thicket on that mountain, providentially put there by God.

Interestingly, you can also see a glimpse of Abraham's faith that God had a plan in place even before they went up the mountain. He told his young men:

Genesis 22:5 (NKJV)

And Abraham said to his young men, “Stay here with the donkey; the lad and I will go yonder and worship, and we will come back to you.”

Notice what he says: “we will come back.” Not I. This indicates that even Abraham had faith that God could raise up his promised son if necessary.

When Isaac — carrying the wood on his own back (which should tell us something all by itself) — asks his father where the lamb is, Abraham answers:

Genesis 22:8 (NKJV)

And Abraham said, “My son, God will provide for Himself the lamb for a burnt offering.” So the two of them went together.

We would assume that the man climbing that hill was numb, or broken, or blindly obedient. He was none of those things. The New Testament tells us what was going on in the man's mind:

Hebrews 11:17–19 (NKJV)

By faith Abraham, when he was tested, offered up Isaac, and he who had received the promises offered up his only begotten son, of whom it was said, “In Isaac your seed shall be called,” concluding that God was able to raise him up, even from the dead, from which he also received him in a figurative sense.

Here was a man holding God's promise in one hand and God's command in the other, unable to see how both could be true — and he trusted God's character enough to conclude that if Isaac died, God would raise him. He obeyed because he believed God would keep His word. He was not a father who had made peace with losing his son. He was a father who had decided God could not lose him.

And at the top of the mountain, God speaks:

Genesis 22:12–13 (NKJV)

And He said, “Do not lay your hand on the lad, or do anything to him; for now I know that you fear God, since you have not withheld your son, your only son, from Me.” Then Abraham lifted his eyes and looked, and there behind him was a ram caught in a thicket by its horns. So Abraham went and took the ram, and offered it up for a burnt offering instead of his son.

Instead of his son. That is the sentence the whole chapter was building up toward, and it is the answer to the question we started with. The nations around Abraham fed their children to their gods. Israel's God stopped the hand of the one man who was willing, and put an animal in the boy's place. And when the Law came, He said it in words no one could soften — the thing the nations did for their gods was the thing He hated, an abomination He never commanded and that never entered His mind (Deuteronomy 12:31; Jeremiah 32:35). God never wanted the boy dead. He wanted a father who would trust Him with the boy, and then He provided the substitute Himself.

Which is why Genesis 22 is not finally about a knife withheld. It is about a substitute given — and about a mountain God was pointing to the whole time.

Centuries later, on a hill in that same country, another Father brought His only Son up the slope, and the Son carried the wood on His own back. That time, no voice called from heaven. No ram was found in the thicket. The knife did not stop, because there was no substitute left to find — the Son was the substitute, and the debt was His to pay.

Romans 8:32 (NKJV)

He who did not spare His own Son, but delivered Him up for us all, how shall He not with Him also freely give us all things?

God did not spare His own Son so that He could spare us. On Moriah He gave a ram in the place of a boy; at Calvary He gave His Son in the place of His people. So the answer to the question is a firm no — God does not command human sacrifice. Rather, He gave His own incarnate Son as the sacrifice, for the benefit of everyone who will turn from their sin to Him.

God does not command human sacrifice but instead provided the ultimate sacrifice for us and by believing in it and repenting of our sins we are granted everlasting life.

How can God be jealous?

How can God get jealous?

Last Updated

Jul 23, 2026

Reading Time 'Minutes'

Word Count

Exodus 34:14 (NKJV)

for you shall worship no other god, for the LORD, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God.

Think of the last time you called someone jealous. You almost certainly did not mean it as a compliment. We use the word for the husband scrolling through his wife's phone, for the friend who cannot be glad when a rival is praised, for the quiet wanting of what belongs to someone else.

And so when we come to Scripture and find that one of God's own names is Jealous, it unsettles us. The word seems to say something troubling about His very character.

So whatever this jealousy is, it is not simply ours dressed up in holy clothes. In us jealousy is a fault; in God there is no fault to be found. He is not troubled by it. Nothing rises in Him and falls again the way a mood rises and falls in us. The question, then, is not whether God is jealous — but how the word we reserve for a sin can be one of the names of God.

Let's begin with a picture. A man discovers that his wife has been unfaithful, and he feels nothing. No grief, no anger. He shrugs. What do we make of him? We do not admire his calm; we sense that something is missing in him. A husband who can watch his marriage betrayed and stay unmoved never truly loved his wife to begin with. The capacity to be wounded is not the enemy of love but its evidence. A love that can lose everything and feel nothing was never really love.

So the word covers two very different things. One is envy that covets our neighbour's possessions, and this is a sin. But there is another kind: the refusal to give up on love. A wife's faithfulness belongs to her husband, and he does not sin by wanting it.

God's jealousy can be likened to this second kind. He does not envy, because everything that exists is already His. He is not insecure, because He alone has never had cause to be. When God is jealous He is not grasping after a love He has no claim to; He is guarding a love that is already His — His by right of creation, and His by right of redemption.

Scripture expresses this jealousy through the picture of marriage. God commands the prophet Hosea to take Gomer, a woman who will betray him, and to go on loving her through her unfaithfulness — a living portrait of the LORD's love for a faithless Israel.

Paul carries the same image into the New Testament:

2 Corinthians 11:2 (NKJV)

For I am jealous for you with godly jealousy. For I have betrothed you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ.

This is the jealousy the Bible describes: a husband's jealousy for the wife who is his by covenant. Picture the alternative — a husband who felt none of it, who watched his wife leave for another man and merely wished them well. We would not call him loving. We would call him a stranger to his own marriage.

In the end God is jealous for His own glory. This might sound like vanity to our minds. But in reality it is the very opposite. Vanity is a small creature demanding a glory it does not own. God demands only what is true. He is God, and there is no other.

WHEN GOD IS JEALOUS FOR US, HE MAKES A STRONG, EXCLUSIVE DEMAND ON US THAT WE MUST TREAT ONLY THE LORD AND NO ONE ELSE IN ALL THE UNIVERSE AS GOD.

Why did Jesus tell People to Keep His Miracles Secret?

Why did Jesus command not to tell others of the miracles He performed?

Last Updated

Jul 16, 2026

Reading Time 'Minutes'

Word Count

In the Gospels we often find Jesus performing a miracle and then instructing those He healed to keep it quiet. Scholars sometimes call this the Messianic Secret. A clear example is Mark 1:43–44, where, after healing a man of leprosy, Jesus sternly warns him to tell no one.

This raises a fair question. If Jesus' miracles were signs of His divine authority, why would He command secrecy? Wouldn't He have gained more followers by making the most of them? Scripture points to several reasons.

The Jewish people held specific expectations of the Messiah, many of them anticipating a political liberator who would throw off Roman rule. Jesus' mission was not to overthrow earthly powers but to establish the reign of God — a kingdom not of this world (John 18:36). A wave of miracle-driven enthusiasm would have fed the wrong expectation, drawing crowds who wanted a conqueror rather than a Saviour. Jesus did not want people following Him merely for what He could do for them; He wanted them to come for who He was, and for the gospel He came to preach.

There was also the matter of timing. Throughout the Gospels Jesus moves toward the cross on a deliberate schedule — “My hour has not yet come” (John 2:4; see also John 7:30; 8:20). A surge of public excitement over His miracles could have forced a confrontation with the authorities before that appointed hour, or swept Him into a movement to crown Him king by force (John 6:15). By restraining how widely His miracles spread, Jesus kept hold of the timing, so that He would go to the cross at the moment the Father had set, and on the Father's terms.

Most importantly, the full truth of who Jesus was could not be grasped until after the cross and the empty tomb. The people were looking for a conquering Messiah, not a crucified one. To proclaim “He is the Messiah” before Calvary would only have spread the message about the king without the kingdom message Jesus came to deliver. This is why, after the Transfiguration, Jesus charged His disciples to tell no one what they had seen “till the Son of Man had risen from the dead” (Mark 9:9). The secret had an expiry date: it would hold only until the cross and resurrection made plain what kind of Messiah He truly was.

There is a lesson for us here, too. Just as Jesus would not let the crowds reduce Him to a miracle-worker, God would not have us reduce Him to a giver of physical or financial blessings. The greatest miracle He offers is not healing or provision, but salvation.

Today the command has flipped. Once Jesus said: tell no one. Now He says: go and tell everyone (Matthew 28:19–20; Acts 1:8). The cross has rewritten the rules — the secret is now news.

Rather than focusing on physical or financial blessings, God would prefer that we focus on the miracle of salvation.

Could Jesus have sinned?

Could Jesus have sinned?

Last Updated

Jul 16, 2026

Reading Time 'Minutes'

Word Count

Christians believe that Jesus has two natures: He is fully God and fully man — truly God and truly man, 100% of each. As God, who is holy and divine, He could have no sin in Him. Yet some have wondered whether His human nature, taken on when He became a mortal man, might have carried an inclination toward sin, since every other human is born with original sin. How do we reconcile this?

To describe whether Jesus could sin, theologians use two terms: peccability and impeccability. Those who hold that Christ was peccable argue that He could have sinned but chose not to. Those who hold to His impeccability argue that because Christ was by nature holy, He was not only sinless but incapable of sinning.

Belief in Christ's impeccability — His utter holiness and separation from sin — is supported throughout Scripture:

  • 2 Corinthians 5:21 says He “knew no sin”;
  • Hebrews 4:15 states that He was “in all points tempted as we are, yet without sin”;
  • Hebrews 7:26 describes Him as “holy, harmless, undefiled, separated from sinners”; and
  • 1 Peter 2:22 affirms that He “committed no sin.”

Jesus' sinlessness stands at the centre of the Christian faith, above all in His role as the spotless Lamb who became the ultimate sacrifice for our sins. As 2 Corinthians 5:21 explains, He “who knew no sin” was made “to be sin for us, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.” A sacrifice for sin must itself be without sin; only a sinless Saviour could carry the sin of others.

This raises a fair question: how could Jesus be tempted at all, if He could not sin? The answer lies in a distinction theologians have drawn for centuries — between Jesus' nature and Jesus' person.

Sin is the act of a moral agent; it is something a person does. But whether a person can sin depends on what kind of person they are. Adam was a created being — finite and testable. He could sin, and he did. Every human person since Adam is now born with a corrupted nature inclined toward sin; we are, as Ephesians 2:3 puts it, “by nature children of wrath.”

Christ is different. He is the eternal Son of God — holy from eternity, the second person of the Trinity. Scripture is explicit that God cannot sin: “God cannot be tempted by evil” (James 1:13), and “it is impossible for God to lie” (Hebrews 6:18). The eternal Son shares the one divine nature with the Father and the Spirit, and so the eternal Son cannot sin.

When Jesus took on human nature, He did not stop being the eternal Son. He remained one person — the divine Son — now possessing both a divine nature and a real human nature. That human nature was fully human, uncorrupted by the Fall, and capable of feeling the full weight of temptation. He hungered in the wilderness. He sweated blood in Gethsemane.

So could Christ feel the pull of temptation in His human nature? Yes. Could He give in to sin? No — because the person feeling that pull was the eternal Son of God, and the Son cannot yield to sin. Real temptation reached a real human nature, but the person at the centre of that nature was God Himself.

It helps to be clear about what Hebrews 4:15 means when it says Christ was tempted “in all points.” This need not mean every conceivable kind of temptation. It can be understood as describing the temptations common to a human life — the kinds a child, an adolescent, and a grown man would face. The point is not that He met every possible category of temptation, but that whatever temptation came, He bore it to its fullest degree.

Some have questioned whether the testing was real at all, since Jesus could not have sinned. But we must remember that He is unlike us in one crucial way. When we are tempted, the pull meets something within us that wants to yield; there is an inward inclination, and often an inward battle. With Christ there was no such inclination. The temptation came — the pressure, the weight, even the anguish of Gethsemane — but it met no answering desire within Him. The door was barred and shut.

This is why His temptation was real and costly precisely because He never gave in. We give in early; He bore the full weight of temptation all the way to its limit. That is what Hebrews 4:15 means when it says He was “in all points tempted as we are, yet without sin”: He has felt the pull of temptation more fully than we ever have, not less.

And here Hebrews 4:15 does not stop at “without sin.” Its main point is that we have “a High Priest who [can] sympathize with our weaknesses.” Because Jesus was genuinely tempted — because He felt the pressure of trial to its very limit and never broke — He is able to understand us when we are tried. His sinlessness does not hold Him at a cold distance from our struggles; it means He faced those struggles head-on and overcame them, so that He can stand with us in ours.

The fact that Jesus was tempted, then, was never meant to show that He was sinful. It was meant to prove the opposite — that He was sinless — and to display a holiness that temptation could press against with its full force and never move.

GOD MADE HIM WHO HAD NO SIN TO BE SIN FOR US, SO THAT IN HIM WE MIGHT BECOME THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF GOD

2 Corinthians 5:21

Why is Jesus called Son of God?

Why is Jesus called 'Son of God'?

Last Updated

Jul 16, 2026

Reading Time 'Minutes'

Word Count

Jesus is called God's Son all through the New Testament. However, while reading the scriptures, you will also notice that the title ‘Son of God’ is also used in reference to human beings, to angels, to the nation of Israel and to King David. So before we can say why it matters so much that Jesus bears this title, we have to see how it is used of everyone else, and then how His sonship differs from them all.

Let’s take a look at some of the Bible's references to the ‘Sons of God’.

Human beings in general are called ‘God's children.’ God created us and sustains us and as a human father provides for his family, God also provides for us, though much more significantly.

Acts 17:28 (NKJV)

for in Him we live and move and have our being, as also some of your own poets have said, ‘For we are also His offspring.’

The angels are called Sons of God because God sustains them and for their role in carrying out His commands.

Job 1:6 (NKJV)

Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan also came among them.

The nation of Israel is called ‘God's son’ by covenant. When God redeemed Israel out of Egypt, He claimed the nation as His own son. Israel did not come to be as other nations did. God formed it by His own hand and bound the nation to Himself by covenant.

Exodus 4:22 (NKJV)

Then you shall say to Pharaoh, ‘Thus says the LORD: “Israel is My son, My firstborn.”’

King David was called the Son of God in the sense of his office — as God’s anointed representative on the throne.

2 Samuel 7:14 (NKJV)

I will be his Father, and he shall be My son.

It is clear that the phrase the Son of God is used for a variety of purposes. However, in every one of those cases the sonship is derived. Humanity is son by creation, angels by service, Israel by covenant, David by office. Each was made a son. But Jesus was not made anything. He is the Son by nature — the eternal Son who has always been what He is, of one being with the Father (John 1:1, 18).

And it explains why His sonship was so explosive to those who first heard Him claim it. In the first century, a son took up his father’s trade; a son’s work was his father’s work. So to call God His own Father was to say He did the Father’s work — to forgive sins, to give life to the dead, to judge the world. These are not things a creature does. Yet these are exactly the works Jesus claimed as His own. His hearers understood Him perfectly:

John 5:18 (NKJV)

Therefore the Jews sought all the more to kill Him, because He not only broke the Sabbath, but also said that God was His Father, making Himself equal with God.

Notice what they heard: not a lesser title, but a claim of equality with God — and they were right to hear it that way. Jesus did not correct them. He pointed them to the very same evidence:

John 10:37-38 (NKJV)

If I do not do the works of My Father, do not believe Me; but if I do, though you do not believe Me, believe the works, that you may know and believe that the Father is in Me, and I in Him.

The works prove the sonship — not the other way round. He does what only God does because He is what only God is.

Here, then, is the difference. Humanity is God's offspring in creation. The angels are God's sons in service. Israel was God's son in covenant. David was God's son in office. But Jesus is God's Son in being. The others bear the title; He is the title. That is the difference.

Jesus is the Son of God by virtue of His position in the Trinity as the Son.