How can i be sure that the right books were included in the bible?

How can I be sure that the right books were included in the bible?

Last Updated

Jan 22, 2025

Reading Time 'Minutes'

Word Count

Many people question whether the right books were added to the Bible during its canonization (compilation), and if God  did indeed inspire all of them? Concerns also arise about books discovered post-canonization that were not included.

So is the Bible we have today complete and authorized by God?

Bruce Metzger, a renowned scholar from Princeton University, insightfully stated that, "the canon is a list of authoritative books more than it is an authoritative list of books.” What he implied is that the early Christians did not determine what should be in the Bible rather they discovered what books were ‘inspired’ by God and only put those in the Bible. They did so by asking the following questions:

      • Was it written by an acclaimed prophet of God?
      • Was the writing confirmed by the acts of God or by someone who was an established eyewitness? For example, Paul, who witnessed the resurrected Jesus and performed miracles, worked closely with Luke, who carefully investigated and interviewed multiple eyewitnesses to write his account.Was it widely accepted by the people of God?

Further, the approved 66 books that were canonized also met the following criteria:

      • They were recorded during the lives of the apostles’.
      • They were acknowledged by the early church fathers as authoritative.
      • They were collected in a single volume, not as scattered manuscripts.
      • They were publicly read and explained, not hidden or exclusive to a few people.
      • They were commentaries written on these books, which means they had to be thoroughly studied.
      • They were acknowledged by opponents who admitted that that the gospels were written by the disciples.

In some way, all of the 66 books of the Bible we have today meet one or more of these criteria.

In addition, people question the inclusion of certain Apocryphal books (covered in the next question)  and  recent discoveries like the "Gospel of Thomas" and "Gospel of Judas.” However these were later found to be forgeries, not written during the apostles’ lifetimes (written during the second century), failing to meet the early church’s criteria for canonicity.

The rigorous and spiritually guided process of canonization assures us that the Bible we have today is complete and authoritative. The 66 books of the Bible meet the stringent criteria set by early Christian Church, affirming their divine inspiration and historical reliability.

The 66 books of the Bible were carefully recognized as divinely inspired through rigorous criteria, affirming their completeness, historical reliability, and authority as God's Word.

What does it mean to blaspheme the Holy Spirit?

What does it mean to blaspheme the Holy Spirit?

Last Updated

Jul 24, 2026

Reading Time 'Minutes'

Word Count

Quick Answer

If you are afraid you have committed it, you have not. Blaspheming the Spirit is not swearing, a stray thought, or doubt. It is looking straight at the Spirit’s work in Christ, knowing what it is, and deliberately calling it evil, as the scribes did (Mark 3:22–30). The very fear of having done it is evidence of a heart still alive to God.

Most people who ask this question are not asking it out of curiosity. They are asking because something went through their mind — a thought about God so ugly they could not believe it came from them — and ever since they have been unable to shake the fear that they crossed a line and cannot come back. Some have carried that fear for years without telling anyone.

If that is why you are reading this, here is the answer before the explanation: you have not committed it. Not because the sin is not real, but because of what it actually is. Read on and you will see why the fear you are feeling is itself the evidence.

The question comes from something Jesus said in Mark's Gospel.

Mark 3:28–30 (NKJV)

“Assuredly, I say to you, all sins will be forgiven the sons of men, and whatever blasphemies they may utter; but he who blasphemes against the Holy Spirit never has forgiveness, but is subject to eternal condemnation” — because they said, “He has an unclean spirit.”

Notice how Mark ends it. He does not leave us guessing what Jesus meant. He tells us plainly: Jesus said this because of what these men were saying. So to understand the sin, we only have to look at what they said and who was saying it.

They were scribes — professional teachers of the Old Testament law, sent down from Jerusalem to assess this new preacher from Galilee.

Mark 3:22 (NKJV)

And the scribes who came down from Jerusalem said, “He has Beelzebub,” and, “By the ruler of the demons He casts out demons.”

Understand what they were watching. Jesus was setting people free from demonic torment, in front of them, repeatedly, and they could not deny that it was happening. So they explained it. The power, they said, was demonic. Satan was casting out Satan.

These were not ordinary men making an honest mistake. They knew the Scriptures better than anyone in Israel. They knew the prophecies of the Messiah. They saw the works, they conceded the works were real, and they looked at the undeniable work of the Holy Spirit and called it the work of hell. Mark's wording is worth noticing: this was not a remark that slipped out once. The tense he uses describes something they went on saying — a settled verdict they returned to and defended.

That is what Jesus calls blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. Not swearing. Not a foul thought. Not doubt. It is looking directly at the Spirit's work in Christ, understanding what you are looking at, and calling it evil.

Why can such a sin not be forgiven? Not because God runs out of mercy, and not because this sin is somehow larger than the cross. Jesus has just said that every other sin and blasphemy can be forgiven, which tells you the limit is not on God's side. The reason is on the sinner's side. A man in that condition has settled it against the only testimony that could ever bring him to repentance. The Spirit's work is to show us Christ. If a man looks at that work and names it demonic, and holds to that, there is nothing left to reach him with. He is not standing at a door God has locked. He is standing at an open door with his back to it, and he will not turn round.

Scripture describes such men in two ways at once, and both are true. They harden themselves — nobody made those scribes say what they said. And God gives them over, withdrawing the restraint that had kept them from going as far as their hearts wanted to go. The Bible never sets these against each other, as though the sinner's guilt reduced God's sovereignty or God's sovereignty reduced the sinner's guilt. The man walks into it freely, and God does not stop him.

Which brings us back to the reader who is frightened.

If you are afraid you have committed this sin, consider what your fear actually tells you. A man hardened enough to call the Holy Spirit demonic and stand by it is not lying awake worrying about it. He does not care. He has no interest in God's forgiveness and no fear of losing it. The very anxiety that drove you to look this up is proof that you are not that man. R. C. Sproul made the point simply: worrying that you have committed the unforgivable sin is itself strong evidence that you have not.

This matters especially for those tormented by thoughts they hate. Some Christians are troubled by blasphemous words and images that arrive unbidden, often at the worst possible moment — in church, in prayer, at the Lord's Table. If that is you, notice something: you hate those thoughts. You are horrified by them. That horror is not the mark of a hardened heart; it is the mark of a heart the Spirit has made alive, because a dead heart feels nothing. The scribes were not appalled at what they said about Jesus. They meant it.

And no one who wants to come to Christ has ever been turned away for this or anything else. That is not a comforting sentiment; it is a promise Jesus made in as many words:

John 6:37 (NKJV)

All that the Father gives Me will come to Me, and the one who comes to Me I will by no means cast out.

Come to Him, and He will not turn you away.

WHEN A PERSON LOSES THE CAPACITY TO REPENT, THEY CANNOT BE SAVED, AND IT IS THIS SIN THAT A PERSON CANNOT BE FORGIVEN BECAUSE THEY HAVE REJECTED THE SPIRIT THAT CONVICTS THEM OF SIN.

What does it mean that Jesus grew in wisdom?

What does it mean that Jesus grew in wisdom?

Last Updated

Jul 16, 2026

Reading Time 'Minutes'

Word Count

Luke tells us twice that Jesus grew. As a child, He “grew and became strong in spirit, filled with wisdom, and the grace of God was upon Him” (Luke 2:40). And again, a few verses later, He “increased in wisdom and stature, and in favor with God and men” (Luke 2:52).

These passages raise a profound question: if Jesus is God, how can He grow in wisdom? Is not omniscience, the state of being all-knowing, an inherent characteristic of God? So how can the One who knows everything increase in anything?

Here is the heart of the answer. Jesus is one person in two natures — fully God and fully man. As God, the Son knows all things and does not change. As man, He had a real human mind that began as an infant's and grew, as every human mind grows. Both are true of the same person, because that person is both God and man. So when Luke writes that Jesus “increased in wisdom,” he is telling us the truth about the Son of God — according to His humanity. The eternal Son did not grow wiser in His deity. He grew in wisdom in the human nature He had taken to Himself.

There is no contradiction here, because the two natures were not in competition. Even as His human mind was learning its first words, the same Son, as God, was upholding the universe and knowing all things (Colossians 1:17). The infinite was not shrunk to fit the manger. The eternal Son took up a true human life and lived it from the inside — while never, for a moment, ceasing to be all that God is.

Also unlike Adam, who was created as a grown man, Jesus was conceived and born and grew like any other child — yet without sin, and without the inherited guilt of Adam (Luke 1:35; Westminster Confession 8.2). He learned to speak, to read the Scriptures, to reason. By the age of twelve His understanding already astonished the teachers in the temple:

Luke 2:47 (NKJV)

And all who heard Him were astonished at His understanding and answers.

Scripture also shows us how His human life was sustained — by the Holy Spirit. The child who grew in wisdom did so as the Spirit rested upon Him, exactly as Isaiah had foretold:

Isaiah 11:2 (NKJV)

The Spirit of the LORD shall rest upon Him, the Spirit of wisdom and understanding, the Spirit of counsel and might, the Spirit of knowledge and of the fear of the LORD.

The Son of God, living a genuinely human life, drew His human wisdom and strength from the Spirit — as we are meant to.

This is also what Paul means by the famous “emptying.” Writing of Christ's humility, he says the Son “made Himself of no reputation” — in Greek, ekénōsen, “He emptied Himself,” from which we get the word kenosis:

Philippians 2:5–8 (NKJV)

Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus, who, being in the form of God, did not consider it robbery to be equal with God, but made Himself of no reputation, taking the form of a bondservant, and coming in the likeness of men. And being found in appearance as a man, He humbled Himself and became obedient to the point of death, even the death of the cross.

The emptying is the taking. Christ emptied Himself not by subtraction — pouring out His deity or laying down His divine attributes — but by addition: “taking the form of a bondservant.” He veiled His glory beneath a real human life and submitted Himself to the Father's will; He did not vacate His divinity to do it.

This is why the Reformed tradition has always rejected the kenotic theology of certain writers, who read Philippians 2 to mean that Christ surrendered some of His divine attributes and became, for a time, less than God. If that were true, He would not have been God on earth — and the Saviour we needed must be fully God, or His death could not save.

The gospels record moments when His divine knowledge broke plainly through the veil: He knew men's thoughts (Matthew 9:4), needed no one to tell Him what was in a person (John 2:24–25), knew a stranger's whole history and a friend's death from far away (John 4:17–18; 11:11–14). And there were things He asked about, and learned, and grew into, as a man.

This even answers the verse where Jesus says no one knows the hour of the end times — not even the Son, but only the Father (Mark 13:32). How can the omniscient Son not know? In the very same way He could grow in wisdom at all: according to His human nature. As God, He knew the day. As man — in the knowledge He lived by, day to day, in submission to the Father — it had not been given Him.

The Son of God did not merely appear to be human. He took a true human nature and grew up inside it — learning to speak, to reason, to obey — so that there is no part of our weakness He has not passed through Himself. That is why He is the High Priest we needed: not one who watches our frailty from a distance, but one who “can sympathize with our weaknesses,” having been “in all points tempted as we are, yet without sin” (Hebrews 4:15). The God who knows all things learned, as a child, what it is to be us.

In conclusion, Jesus' growth in wisdom as described in Luke is a profound illustration of His complete humanity. While He never ceased to be fully divine, He embraced the human experience, including learning and growing in wisdom. This aspect of Jesus' life demonstrates His humility and identification with humanity, but also establishes Him as a Great High Priest, uniquely able to sympathize with our weaknesses (Hebrews 4:14-16).

Christ was therefore subject to the normal process of human growth—intellectually, physically, spiritually, and socially.

What is the real meaning of Christmas?

What is the real meaning of Christmas?

Last Updated

Feb 19, 2025

Reading Time 'Minutes'

Word Count

The true meaning of Christmas is the celebration of the eternal love of God for all of humanity.

We hear a lot of stories about Christmas, but the real story is God becoming a human being through the person of Jesus Christ.

Humanity was in a fallen state, and so Jesus came to this world to pay the ultimate price for our sins and restore our relationship with the Father, 

Romans 5:8 (NIV)

But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us.

Christmas was necessary because we all needed a savior, and this is the good news that the angel told the shepherds who were out in the fields. 

LUKE 2:10-11 (NIV)

10. But the angel said to them, “Do not be afraid. I bring you good news that will cause great joy for all the people. 

11. Today in the town of David, a Savior has been born to you; he is the Messiah, the Lord.

We celebrate the SAVIOR because we needed deliverance from our sins. 

We celebrate the Messiah because He fulfilled all that the law required and is a testament to everyone that all of God’s promises are yes and amen. 

We celebrate Jesus as the divine Lord, who, in His very humility, took on the role of a servant for our sake. 

This Christmas season, don’t look for presents under a tree but rather seek for His presence that will set you free.

Christmas is the celebration of God’s love—Jesus came to save, fulfill God’s promises, and bring us into His presence.

Does God not care about the millions of starving children in the world?

Does God not care about the millions of starving children in the world?

Last Updated

Jul 23, 2026

Reading Time 'Minutes'

Word Count

The problem of hunger is real in our world today. Millions of children go hungry, many die of malnutrition, and the suffering is exactly as terrible as the critic says. This forms the common accusation that God, if He existed and cared, would not stand by while children starve.

The answer begins with a fact that surprises most people who raise the objection. Child hunger is not caused by a shortage of food. Relief organisations and government agencies consistently report that the world already produces enough to feed every person alive. The problem has never been availability; it is access. Food exists in abundance — it simply does not reach the mouths that need it.

If God had made a world too poor to feed its children, the charge against Him would stand. But He did not. He gave a world with more than enough, and appointed us to manage it — “Then God blessed them, and God said to them, ‘Be fruitful and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it’” (Genesis 1:28). The failure lies in that stewardship, not in the provision. Unjust distribution, economic inequality, corruption, and political strife stand between the food that exists and the children who need it. Behind each of these is a human choice. We hoard what we could share, and mismanage what we were trusted to steward. God is not the author of the greed, indifference, and cruelty that keep food from the hungry; those are our sins, not His design, and it is dishonest to charge Him with the very evils He commands us to end.

None of this makes God distant from the suffering. Scripture presents Him as the particular defender of the vulnerable child. Jesus warned against despising them: “Take heed that you do not despise one of these little ones, for I say to you that in heaven their angels always see the face of My Father who is in heaven” (Matthew 18:10). A God who assigns heaven's attention to a single child is not indifferent to millions of them. And His care is not merely declared — it is delegated. He has made His people the means by which the hungry are fed: “For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand that we should walk in them” (Ephesians 2:10). The Church has done this work for centuries, running the hospitals, orphanages, and relief agencies that carry food and care to the poorest places on earth. When the critic asks where God is in the face of child hunger, part of the honest answer is that He is at work in every believer who feeds a hungry child.

So the objection, pressed to the end, turns back on the one who makes it. It assumes God should override human sin by force and feed the children Himself, while overlooking that He has already provided the food, already commanded that it be shared, and already sent His people to share it. The hunger persists because that command is refused — not because God is absent, but because we are disobedient. The right response to the starving child is therefore not to accuse God, but to obey Him.

GOD HAS APPOINTED US AS TRUSTWORTHY STEWARDS OF THE WORLD’S RESOURCES

what does it mean Christianity is a relationship, not a religion?

What does it mean when said, "Christianity is relationship and not a religion?"

Last Updated

Feb 15, 2025

Reading Time 'Minutes'

Word Count

The Christian faith is often described as a relationship with God through His Son, Jesus, rather than a religion. But what does this mean?

In general terms, 'religion' is seen as humans striving to reach up to God to become acceptable to Him. In stark contrast, Christianity presents a paradigm where God reaches down to humanity.

It is God who initiates this relationship, not us. As stated in 1 John 4:19 (NKJV), “We love because He first loved us.” This verse signifies that God's love precedes and enables our love for Him.

In His relationship with us, God sets a higher standard of love than what we typically know. John 15:13 (NKJV) says, “Greater love has no one than this, than to lay down one’s life for his friends.” This verse speaks volumes about the sacrificial nature of Jesus’ love and His ultimate sacrifice for our sins.

Following Jesus’ death and resurrection, the need for religious rituals to cleanse sin was abolished. Having a relationship with God transcends  common ritualistic spiritual behavior seen in other world religions. False religions are often tethered to strenuous rituals and traditions that make faith merely a chore rather than something to cherish.

We do not get to heaven because we are tagged as Christian. Rather, it is through a personal relationship with God, made possible through belief in Jesus Christ.

On a side note, God did not just become loving when He created humanity. The Scriptures state that “He is love”, it is part of His very being. This is possible because of the concept of the Trinity (1 God in 3 distinct persons - Father, Son, and Holy Spirit). In the Trinity there has always existed a loving relationship/community within the Godhead.

God now invites us into this community to fellowship and spend  an eternity with Him. If you are seeking a relationship with the creator of the universe, the Christian Faith and the Lord Jesus Christ offer a path not just to a religion, but to a life-transforming relationship.

Christianity is not about religion but a relationship—God reaching down to us through Jesus Christ in love.